HDD Tools , Repair , Recovery , Support widely Discuession

egyfixlab

Administrator
Staff member
Board-Admin
#1
Discussion Subject
Discussion about HDD Tools Function
here we start this Discussion so we will put every points , all views in HDD Tools , all Tools ,
we didn't support any tools , also we didn't make less value for any tools
we just Give our opinion Related to Practical use of Actual tools ,
and every opinion for any engineer here for Repair or recovery
Describe his own view not all our public View , Let's Start and i hope Discussion will help all users and guests
 

egyfixlab

Administrator
Staff member
Board-Admin
#4
many user ask about which Tool is good , which tools is best , i believe that there is no complete tools , and every tools have it's own special Feature add to this public Feature that is shared between all , , some tools have Bright Future Related to it's Development process , and other tools are going to dark way
 

egyfixlab

Administrator
Staff member
Board-Admin
#7
For WD , i think all Tools RIP on Trex , even when they add update they catch Trex Function , except PC3k they have there solutions , like Online Refurbishing Function this is Trex Function and Trex Parameter (added in DFL , MRT , Sediv ) and i'm sure they wait for trex 8000XX to Rip there Function and implement even when they add they just Copy + Paste
 

ehsan_tk

New member
Registered
#10
i think PC3K has a powerfull Core and stable cuase it dosen't show strange and different messages and errors at the same situation unlike MRTsometimes, and good design for long hours using,but of course it can be better in some family of Seagate support, and i've heard their Team are working hard on new data storage getting universal like SSD and features.
 

egyfixlab

Administrator
Staff member
Board-Admin
#12
i think PC3K has a powerfull Core and stable cuase it dosen't show strange and different messages and errors at the same situation unlike MRTsometimes, and good design for long hours using,but of course it can be better in some family of Seagate support, and i've heard their Team are working hard on new data storage getting universal like SSD and features.
for Recovery pc3k is best with good support team , but for repair is late comparing to other tools
 

Kash

New member
Registered
#13
Hi I have both mrt and dfl . Comparing both I like the user interface of dfl it’s very easy to use and their gui is good and they support all harddisk compared to mrt and their remote support is another add on for that tool.
 

egyfixlab

Administrator
Staff member
Board-Admin
#14
MRT for EX is good in seagate , bad in Toshiba , and 40% good in Hitachi , they add VT loader Function by Rom injection this is Fairly good , and help to fix Critical issue in Seagate Grenada , and same Structure HDD , also PC3K in Same time add Rosewood unlock and this also was Great Feature to Complete Solution for Rosewood in this Time , Both Tools Concentrate n Recovery , but no Recovery without Complete Repair Solution
 

egyfixlab

Administrator
Staff member
Board-Admin
#15
Hi I have both mrt and dfl . Comparing both I like the user interface of dfl it’s very easy to use and their gui is good and they support all harddisk compared to mrt and their remote support is another add on for that tool.
Remote Support is good Support Feature in DFL , but the ystill need Tons of update to Complete there work , DFL need many Function Comparing to MRT , specially for Repair issue , very week in seagate , good in WD
 

Kash

New member
Registered
#16
Remote Support is good Support Feature in DFL , but the ystill need Tons of update to Complete there work , DFL need many Function Comparing to MRT , specially for Repair issue , very week in seagate , good in WD
There are few unique features like temperature adjustment and preamp identification in dfl which are not in pc3k and mrt
 

egyfixlab

Administrator
Staff member
Board-Admin
#17
There are few unique features like temperature adjustment and preamp identification in dfl which are not in pc3k and mrt
Actually Till now DFL not Support 5400.6 cut head , i din't use DFL , but i check all feature , since 10 min i remote user in Indonesia , and let me say DFL is Friendly interface , but lack of powerful Function , some Critical Function Like virtual loader in Grenada , how can you Format SA in DFL for these new Families ?
 

egyfixlab

Administrator
Staff member
Board-Admin
#18
Some one ask me in private about Sediv , let me say in my opinion Sediv in the end of the list
to be fair Sediv is good in Toshiba , bad in seagate and hitachi need Tons of update to be good software
this still my opinion in this thread
 

Emad Almyhoub

Member
Registered
VIP-Membership
#19
Actually Till now DFL not Support 5400.6 cut head , i din't use DFL , but i check all feature , since 10 min i remote user in Indonesia , and let me say DFL is Friendly interface , but lack of powerful Function , some Critical Function Like virtual loader in Grenada , how can you Format SA in DFL for these new Families ?
my prof i can cut head in 5400.6 by DFL ... I was cut head 2 in wyatt 5400.6
 
Top